Thursday, 17 April 2025

Big asks and uphill tasks - making a case for TBLT by Neil McMillan

I’ve just watched the plenary  that Neil McMillan gave in the morning of the final day of #IATEFL2025. I’d attended live Catherine Walter’s plenary session on what has changed in 50 years as that is very much the same timeframe that I have lived through. I’ll watch the other plenaries later on.



Task Based Language Teaching has always been a hard-sell even among people who see the logic of it, maybe because  it isn’t as easy as that to actually do for the many reasons Neill outlined. One of the reasons is that it’s much easier to use English File, which is so packed with exercises and other material that the teacher will never run out of material instead of choosing a task-based curriculum and persuading  students, parents, colleagues and bosses that you haven’t lost your mind as well as your way!

Research is very much a university thing so it is difficult to find research papers about the use of tasks in language schools and even harder to find them used in secondary or primary schools. Lack of research though isn’t the only obstacle: a much bigger one is the fact that there are very few commercially produced materials that are based on TBLT and equally few databases of tasks for teachers to draw on. There are two, provided by Neill: https://www.iatblt.org/resources

Just as I was noting, “Please can we have more examples of tasks that could form part of a TBLT course or that could be a task based on a standard coursebook. We are at the half way point in the talk!” Neill provided one that would not have showed up on anyone’s needs analysis! How to solve ‘the problem of alligators in the Underground of New York’

The task could be done in small groups with groups comparing solutions and learning from each other, but some sort of monologue outlining the planned solution(s) seems to me inevitable as the final part of the task. This could and should be recorded.

Neill included in the list of possible Post-task options, ‘Discuss and Correct errors collected by the teacher’ and ‘Transcribe and analyse transcriptions: what could I have said better?’

We all try to relate what we hear in presentations to our own situations and our own ideas, so I jumped on these two post-task activities as being exactly what my 9-step prompt for ChatGPT aims to do: to work on errors (Steps 1-3) and suggest better ways to say the same thing (Steps 4-9). Steps 3, 5, 7 & 9 are all there to allow students to listen to the improved version, so there are really only 5 steps:

  • Identify errors
  • Correct errors
  • Suggest improvements at the student's current level
  • Suggest improvements at a slightly higher level
  • Suggest improvements at an even higher level
     Here are some YouTube videos about my 9-step prompt from the shortest to my full presentation as at #IATEFL2025:
Screen Recording of My 9-step prompt in action using Turboscribe.ai ChatGPT (7 minutes)

How students can use Turboscribe and ChatGPT to get feedback on a recording they have made (17 minutes)

"Your students can get feedback every time they speak" Rehearsal for EUROCALL JALTCALL webinar (43 minutes)







1 comment: