The person most interested in and in need of feedback on speaking is the student. The teacher’s interest is more periferal.

The person most interested in and in need of feedback on speaking is the student. The teacher’s interest is more periferal. It is important that the feedback should be as immediate as possible and should include an opportunity to self correct errors identified by the tool before seeing the corrections. But there needs to be a further kind of feedback suggesting ways the student could say it better at their own level or at future levels the student might aspire to.

By using a combination of a transcription tool like Turboscribe.ai and a long Custom Prompt for ChatGPT, students can get all this. It isn’t perfect but I believe it is ‘good enough’

Here is an example of such feedback and a long conversation with ChatGPT about its inaccuracies in grading:

https://chatgpt.com/share/67d15f5b-c450-800b-a548-b5b9d1d5c917

I was commenting on an article in FLT Mag https://fltmag.com/language-assessment-ai/